Responsible AI Summit Main Conference Day 1 - Monday 21 September


Morning Plenary Session

8:00 am - 8:45 am Registration & Breakfast

img

Suzanne Brink

Head of Responsible AI
Lloyds Banking Group

In boardrooms, AI discussions are no longer abstract, they are charged with urgency, competing priorities, and hard trade-offs. C-suite leaders are navigating pressure to move fast while confronting rising demands for accountability, safety, and trust. This opening panel sets the scene for 2026 and explores the tensions shaping those conversations, how executives are interpreting "Responsible AI," and where alignment, and friction, is emerging at the top.

· Balancing speed with accountability in AI adoption.

· Interpreting Responsible AI across competing executive priorities.

· Managing trade-offs between innovation, risk, and governance.

img

Ajay Chakravarthy

Chief AI Officer
Thales

img

Rebecca Salsbury

Chief Product and Technology Officer
Financial Times

img

Sray Agarwal

Head of Infosys Responsible AI Office (EMEA)
Infosys

9:30 am - 10:00 am From Responsible AI to Responsible Autonomy: Are We Ready for AI That Acts?

Syed Quiser Ahmed - AVP, Global Head of Infosys Responsible AI Office, Infosys

AI is moving from systems that generate answers to agents that can make decisions, access systems, and take actions on our behalf. This changes the Responsible AI challenge from asking whether an AI output is trustworthy to asking whether the autonomous system itself is safe, bounded, secure, and accountable. The keynote will explore what "meaningful human control" should look like in an agentic world, and whether today's governance frameworks are sufficient for AI that can act independently. The central question: How do we enable autonomy without giving up control?



img

Syed Quiser Ahmed

AVP, Global Head of Infosys Responsible AI Office
Infosys

10:00 am - 10:30 am Presentation - Responsible AI, Agentic Systems, and What Actually Scales

Daniel Hulme - Chief AI Officer, WPP
AI has moved beyond proof-of-concept, but the gap between ambition and sustained enterprise value remains. Scaling successfully depends not just on the technology itself but on how organisations think about it - cutting through hype, building genuine literacy, and putting the right governance in place so that agentic AI can deliver real commercial outcomes. In this keynote, Dr Daniel Hulme, Chief AI Officer at WPP, will offer a practical framework for thinking about AI and agentic technologies - where the genuine opportunities lie, and where organisations risk being seduced by inflated expectations.
  • A practical framework for AI and agentic adoption that cuts through the hype.
  • Why governance and literacy are prerequisites for scaling - and how to frame that in terms the C-suite values.
  • Augmenting, not replacing using AI and agents to unlock creative and commercial potential.
  • The broader implications of these technologies for business and society.
img

Daniel Hulme

Chief AI Officer
WPP

AI regulation is accelerating, yet many organisations still struggle to translate legal obligations into effective, day to day governance. Under the EU AI Act and emerging standards frameworks, organisational functions including Legal and Governance are collectively responsible for risk classification, oversight, documentation, and organisational controls, but often approach these duties from different angles. This session explores how Legal and Governance teams can work together in practice: aligning responsibilities, streamlining AI use case triage, and building a shared governance model that stands up to regulatory scrutiny.

• Aligning legal and governance roles through shared ac-countability models

• Improving AI use case filtering to focus oversight where it matters most

• Strengthening collaboration by clarifying what Governance needs from Legal to operationalise compliance


img

Barbara Zapisetskaya

Principal Counsel
EBRD

img

Kirsten Van der Zwan

Chief Privacy Officer and Global Head of Privacy, AI & Digital Compliance
Signify

img

Gwen Morvan

Senior Legal Counsel
Synthesia

img

Nick Wild

Senior AI Governance Lead
Swift

11:10 am - 11:40 am Morning Coffee Break and Speed Networking Session

Take a break, recharge, and make some new connections! This fast‑paced networking speed round gives you the chance to meet multiple peers over refreshments, exchange insights, and spark conversations you can continue throughout the event.

Morning Streamed Sessions

Stream A – Governance: Legal, Compliance, and Accountability

11:40 am - 12:10 pm A Framework for AI Monitoring: Internal Metrics and External Risks
Gerald Kierce - Co-Founder & CEO, Trustible

Deploying an AI system is not the finish line but the start of an ongoing obligation, one most organisations are not structured to meet. Effective oversight requires monitoring across two equally necessary surfaces: internal monitoring, which tracks cost, quality, drift, safety, and performance over time, and external monitoring, which captures vendor changes, public incidents, and evolving regulation. This session explores why AI monitoring is a genuinely hard problem and why most organizations only build for one side of it. It also examines why governing at the use-case level, rather than the model level, creates oversight that can withstand vendor swaps and mixed deployments.

  • Implementing internal and external monitoring across two equally necessary surfaces.
  • Governing use cases to maintain oversight through vendor and model changes.
  • Evaluating cost, quality, drift, safety, and external risk signals.



img

Gerald Kierce

Co-Founder & CEO
Trustible

Stream A – Governance: Legal, Compliance, and Accountability

12:10 pm - 12:40 pm Presentation – Practical Ways to Manage Third Party and Privacy Risk at Scale
Lucia Batlova - Senior Legal Counsel & EMEA Privacy Lead, Lenovo

AI driven innovation is accelerating, and with it, a surge of new tools, datasets, and experimental vendors vying for a place in the enterprise. Every promising partnership also carries potential privacy, security, and regulatory exposure. In this session, Lucia Batlova, Europe and META Data Protection & Privacy Lead at Lenovo, reveals how teams in a global organization cut through the noise: rapidly assessing high volume third party requests, screening risky AI initiatives without slowing momentum, and enabling safe experimentation at scale. With real world examples, she shows how legal can stay firmly positioned as an innovation accelerator, while keeping risk firmly in check (considering the fragmented global AI landscape & insufficiency of traditional privacy and security frameworks).

• Privacy and legal teams as innovation enablers: managing AI risk without unnecessarily slowing progress 

• Reasonable expectations of privacy, transparency, and trust in AI deployments 

• Third-party AI providers, vendor due diligence, and data-sharing considerations 

• Data use limitations, purpose assessment, and appropriate safeguards 

• Embedding privacy by design into AI and product development processes


img

Lucia Batlova

Senior Legal Counsel & EMEA Privacy Lead
Lenovo

Stream A – Governance: Legal, Compliance, and Accountability

12:40 pm - 1:10 pm Panel Discussion – Embedding EU AI Act Governance: From Regulation to Real-World Implementation
Lara Nogueira - Head of Responsible AI & Data Compliance, Ericsson
Gary Brown - Chief Privacy Officer, Westinghouse Electric Company
Oriana Medlicott - Responsible AI- EU Lead, Admiral Group

As the EU AI Act moves into its implementation phase, the focus is shifting from legislative ambition to operational delivery. Organisations must interpret risk classifications, conformity assessments and oversight duties, while aligning internal governance structures. This session offers a clear and practical update on timelines, enforcement trends and what regulators expect.

• Clarifying risk tiers and governance responsibilities.

• Aligning internal controls with supervisory scrutiny.

• Preparing for documentation, audit and enforcement readiness.


img

Lara Nogueira

Head of Responsible AI & Data Compliance
Ericsson

img

Gary Brown

Chief Privacy Officer
Westinghouse Electric Company

img

Oriana Medlicott

Responsible AI- EU Lead
Admiral Group

The challenge is no longer defining principles but embedding them into delivery. Organisations have moved beyond governance frameworks and are now embedding operational capabilities such as AI risk management, monitoring, model assurance and run time controls directly into technology delivery. This panel discussion will explore the controls that actually work, how to remain in control of agents, and what organisations need to do now to prepare for the next wave of AI adoption.



img

Elisa Sai

Vice President, Analytics and AI
Capgemini Invent

img

Carolina Sanchez Hernandez

AI Governance and Assurance Lead
Capgemini Invent

img

Elisa Sai

Vice President, Analytics and AI
Capgemini Invent

img

Paul Dongha

Head of Responsible AI & AI Strategy
NatWest Group

img

Steven Hodson

Automation & Artificial Intelligence Lead for the National Armaments Directorate
UK Ministry of Defence

Stream B – Technical: Designing Governed Agentic Systems

12:10 pm - 12:40 pm Presentation / Case Study – Designing Guardian Agents: A Taxonomy for Governing Multi-Agent AI Systems
Alessandro Castelnovo - Head of Responsible AI, Intesa Sanpaolo

In this technical case study, Alessandro Castelnovo, Head of Responsible AI at Intesa Sanpaolo, details how the bank designed and operationalised Guardian Agents to govern emerging multi-agent AI ecosystems. He presents a formal taxonomy that combines three operational roles (Reviewers, Monitors, and Protectors) with five structured risk domains: Data Security & Protection; Performance & Reliability; Quality & Compliance; Explainability & Transparency; and Ethical Coordination & Decisioning. The framework clarifies responsibilities, embeds automated safeguards, enables continuous oversight, and supports accountable, resilient orchestration across complex agent networks.

• Formalising operational roles define structured AI oversight mechanisms.

• Creating five risk domains that align governance with concrete control layers.

• Embedding safeguards to enable resilient, accountable multi-agent orchestration.


img

Alessandro Castelnovo

Head of Responsible AI
Intesa Sanpaolo

Stream B – Technical: Designing Governed Agentic Systems

12:40 pm - 1:10 pm Panel Discussion – Who Is the CEO of an Agent? Delegation, Agency & Responsibility
Detlef Nauck - Head of AI & Data Science Research, BT
Olu Akinyede - Data Privacy, Data Governance and AI Ethics, Aviva
Ana Cavez - VP of Sales, Wand AI
Rozemarijn Jens - Senior AI Innovation Lead, Shell

As enterprises delegate decisions to autonomous systems, they must confront a deeper question: what does it mean to transfer authority without severing responsibility? Agentic AI challenges traditional notions of control, oversight, and accountability, forcing organisations to redefine human agency in operational terms. This panel explores the philosophical and practical dimensions of delegation, and the skills required to remain meaningfully responsible for systems that act on our behalf.

• Examining delegation without severing human responsibility.

• Redefining agency in autonomous enterprise systems.

• Building skills for accountable human oversight.




img

Detlef Nauck

Head of AI & Data Science Research
BT

img

Olu Akinyede

Data Privacy, Data Governance and AI Ethics
Aviva

img

Ana Cavez

VP of Sales
Wand AI

img

Rozemarijn Jens

Senior AI Innovation Lead
Shell

Lunch

1:10 pm - 2:00 pm Lunch in the Exhibition Hall: Network with your Peers

Afternoon Streamed Sessions

From engagements with Fortune 500 companies building and scaling enterprise AI, our forward-deployed governance experts share what they're actually seeing on the ground, not theory. This session unpacks where governance earns its place in the AI stack of the future and what separates the programs that scale from those that stall.

img

Ayesha Bhatti

AI Governance Advisor
Credo AI

img

Melanie Hendrickx

Head of Information Security and AI Governance, Risk and Compliance
METRO AG

img

Alberto Barroso

Global Director Advanced Analytics & AI
Danone

img

Briant Gerlach

Global Responsible AI & AI Governance
Danone

Stream A – Governance: Governing Autonomy at Scale

2:30 pm - 3:00 pm Presentation / Case Study – From Regulation to Automation: Scaling AI Governance Without Compliance Drift in the Research and Development Area of Novo Nordisk
Per Rådberg Nagbøl - Senior Data & AI Governance Professional, Novo Nordisk

In highly regulated sectors, such as life sciences, regulatory changes create a hidden risk: compliance drift, beyond the usual data drift. Hence, there is a need for practical strategies to keep AI aligned with evolving regulations and operational realities. This session will present the AI governance setup in the Research and Development area of Novo Nordisk. It will cover ideas, challenges, and practical solutions for automating AI governance without correspondingly scaling human labour. 

• moving from regulation to automatable requirements and processes that enable the use of rule-, chatbot-, and agent-based automation.

• preventing compliance drift.

• making automation complement human labour.

• creating oversight of AI systems and visualise AI system interdependencies.


img

Per Rådberg Nagbøl

Senior Data & AI Governance Professional
Novo Nordisk

Stream A – Governance: Governing Autonomy at Scale

3:00 pm - 3:30 pm Data Governance vs AI Governance: Where Accountability Actually Sits
Penny Jones - Responsible AI Lead, Zurich Insurance
Tom Heath - Chief Data and AI Officer, Ward Williams
Matthew Sutton - AI Assurance Architect, Advai


As organisations scale AI, tensions often emerge between established data governance teams and newly formed AI governance functions. Overlapping mandates can create gaps or unclear accountability. This session takes a practical look at how leading enterprises are defining boundaries, integrating responsibilities, and building operating models that make data and AI governance work together in practice.
• Clarifying mandates between data and AI governance.
• Aligning ownership across the model lifecycle.
• Designing operating models that avoid duplication.



img

Penny Jones

Responsible AI Lead
Zurich Insurance

img

Tom Heath

Chief Data and AI Officer
Ward Williams

img

Matthew Sutton

AI Assurance Architect
Advai

Stream B – Technical: Explainability, Control & Engineering Reality

2:00 pm - 2:30 pm Decoding AI Assurance: ISO 42001, EN 18286, and AIUC-1
Danny Manimbo - Managing Principal, Schellman
Three frameworks, three different jobs. ISO 42001 proves your AI governance is real. EN 18286 — approved this July as the EU AI Act's first harmonized standard — proves you meet Article 17. AIUC-1 proves your agents behave the way you say they do. As the first accredited body for both ISO 42001 and AIUC-1, we'll give a clear, practitioner-level map of how these frameworks relate, where they overlap, and how to match the right one — or combination — to the AI an organization is actually running.

  • What EN 18286's July 2026 approval means for EU AI Act conformity today.
  • Where ISO 42001, EN 18286, and AIUC-1 overlap — and where each one covers something the others don't.
  • A practical way to match assurance frameworks to an organization's actual risk profile.



img

Danny Manimbo

Managing Principal
Schellman

Stream B – Technical: Explainability, Control & Engineering Reality

2:30 pm - 3:00 pm Governing Agentic AI at Scale – What Needs to Change as AI Starts to Act
Luke Vilain - Director, AI Trust (AI Governance & Responsible AI), PwC
Luke Vilain, Director in AI Trust at PwC, will explore where existing governance approaches are being stretched as agents move from experimentation into business processes.

• Scale changes the governance problem – agent creation will increasingly outpace manual governance, making stronger inventory, clearer accountability and a more deliberate definition of what is actually being governed essential
• Governance is moving closer to runtime – human-in-the-loop cannot be the default answer at scale – organisations will need risk-based intervention, stronger permissions, real-time observability and increasingly technical mechanisms that can govern what agents are allowed to do as they act
• The objective should be better AI, not simply more control – emerging approaches such as reusable control architectures, knowledge graphs, AI harnesses and feedback-driven monitoring could make agents more reliable while allowing organisations to experiment and capture value safely

The session will give senior leaders a practical view of where agentic AI governance is heading, the capabilities organisations are likely to need next, and how governance can become an enabler of scalable AI adoption rather than a constraint on it



img

Luke Vilain

Director, AI Trust (AI Governance & Responsible AI)
PwC

Stream B – Technical: Explainability, Control & Engineering Reality

3:00 pm - 3:30 pm Panel Discussion – Engineering vs Governance: Have We Got It Figured Out?
Graham Ross - Head of Responsible AI, Centrica
Stephanie Cairns - Senior Data Scientist, AI Risk, OVO Energy
Uthman Ali - Responsible AI Leader, Emirates

As AI systems scale and grow in complexity, the lines between engineering responsibility and governance oversight can blur. This panel explores where frictions emerge, how technical and governance teams can collaborate effectively, and whether current role definitions are fit for purpose. Through real-world examples, the discussion will probe whether enforcing policy-as-code and defining accountability truly resolves tension.

• Assigning clear roles to reduce friction and evolving with system complexity.

• Embedding governance into practice through technical pipelines.

• Integrating monitoring and checks to enforce accountability in real time.


img

Graham Ross

Head of Responsible AI
Centrica

img

Stephanie Cairns

Senior Data Scientist, AI Risk
OVO Energy

img

Uthman Ali

Responsible AI Leader
Emirates

Afternoon Plenary Session

3:30 pm - 4:00 pm Afternoon Refreshment Break


Responsible AI is full of high‑stakes decisions and uncomfortable trade‑offs, and this session brings them into the open. Participants will engage with a series of provocative statements on today's most contentious AI issues, ranging from frontier scaling to synthetic data, alignment risks, liability boundaries, open‑source governance, model interpretability, and beyond. After hearing each statement, attendees will split into groups, each tackling one hot‑button topic. Within each cohort, participants will debate both the affirmative and the opposing positions, then present their strongest arguments back to the room.
  • Surfacing competing priorities that shape responsible AI decisions.
  • Challenging assumptions through structured, balanced debate.
  • Bridging technical, ethical, and strategic perspectives for better AI governance.

img

Tessa Darbyshire

Head of AI Governance
Informa

img

Caroline Ellis

AI & Data Ethics lead
NatWest Group

Scaling Responsible AI is moving from theory to execution, as organisations look to embed governance directly into how AI is designed and deployed at scale. Alice Genevois and Suzanne Brink explore how organisations can scale AI responsibly through a central and business-led operating model. The session looks at what strong AI use cases look like from a Responsible AI perspective, and how to move beyond one-off governance reviews into reusable, embedded patterns that support day-to-day delivery. It also examines how central expertise and business ownership combine to enable innovation that is trusted, compliant, and scalable.

• Responsible AI scales through clear business ownership, enabled by strong central standards

• Reusable patterns and embedded controls accelerate delivery without increasing risk

• Effective partnership between central and business teams is critical to trust and accountability


img

Suzanne Brink

Head of Responsible AI
Lloyds Banking Group

img

Alice Genevois

Responsible AI Lead for Consumer Relationships
Lloyds Banking Group

Frontier AI capabilities continue to leap forward, reshaping expectations and recalibrating what "state of the art" means almost monthly. Yet inside most organisations, adoption remains steady, deliberate, and constrained by governance, infrastructure, and readiness. This widening gap creates strategic confusion: are we preparing for a world that's already here, or bracing for breakthroughs that won't materialise evenly? This session aims to disentangle technical progress from real‑world absorption capacity, clarify where agentic systems may genuinely transform workflows, and offer a pragmatic lens for prioritising business value amid hype cycles.

·       Accelerating capability growth outpacing enterprise and policy absorption curves.

·       Harnessing agentic systems where frontier advances drive real operational uplift.

·       Prioritising durable shifts while filtering out performative or premature noise.



img

Ramy Erfan

VP Business & Technology Enablement
Citi

img

Oliver Patel

Author of Fundamentals of AI Governance and OECD AI Expert Group
OECD

img

Mo Sadek

AI Security Practitioner
ALICE

img

Graham Ross

Head of Responsible AI
Centrica

5:30 pm - 7:30 pm Evening Networking Drinks Reception Brought To You by Capgemini x Google